the upper floor presents Nymphomaniac slave's apprentice
Whipped Ass - Lesbian BDSM - Updated Weekly in HD

Comments made by Captain_Rabbit

Date Comment Site
Sep 18, 2015

Nice, nice nice ! Apart from all the other good things about this shoot, I liked the little hairs on her arms.

Hogtied
Sep 17, 2015

Very nice !

Hogtied
Sep 17, 2015

A nice girl, and I like the shoot. For me the nipple stretching and the wooden horse were great, the asymmetrical bondage and the head wrapping not so much.

Hogtied
Sep 15, 2015

Very enjoyable. If this is boring, I like boring ! I rate it a 4 and not a 5, because she was 'wearing' too much, all in all, for my taste: clothes in the first scene, wrapping in a later one, nail polish in all of 'em.

Hogtied
Sep 15, 2015

Good set ! And no, I never go to the archives :)) I simply go through the updates in chronological order. When I'll have reached today's shoots, they'll be old news too I guess. But I'm funny that way: just couldn't watch a shoot 'out of sequence'. Having said that: I find lots of great shoots here in 2004 !!

Hogtied
Sep 14, 2015

Great, great, great !! A wonderful update, and a stunning girl. And no or hardly any make-up! That's how I prefer a sub to look: lovely and as natural as possible !

Hogtied
Sep 14, 2015

What a stunning girl ! And she suffers beautifully :) I checked her 'profile' and was glad to see she returned quite a few times !

Hogtied
Sep 13, 2015

Even if this kind of shoot is not my favourite (I think I like one-on-one just a bit better), it's great to see once in a while ! Just to break the routine. Also, I always love seeing Audrey :) And a bonus update is always great !! In Training of O there was a form of competition too, for a while. Just like here: not my favourite, but very enjoyable.

Hogtied
Sep 12, 2015

Yes, beautiful !

Hogtied
Sep 11, 2015

Very good update. And two lovely girls.

Hogtied
Sep 11, 2015

Very, very good !

Hogtied
Sep 10, 2015

A great concept, and a terrific shoot !

Hogtied
Sep 10, 2015

Oh... in my first post that should have been "annoyance", not "annoyment"! If ever there was a wrong spot to make a spelling error, it was in that sentence of mine <lol>

Hogtied
Sep 10, 2015

'Nuff said about make-up ! This was a great shoot !

Hogtied
Sep 10, 2015

I just like to react to the webmaster's remark on 30 june 2004: "Now your telling her she looks cheep and flashy. Natural as possible? Not shaving their armpits, pussies or legs? Where do you draw the line? If the girls like to wear makeup, I'll let them!". You're reacting to a comment that I'm guessing you deleted yourself. That makes a very strange reading. Because of this, I can't see whether or not the commentor was rude in his choice of words. Probably so, judging by your reply. It's more than OK to reprimand a rude commentor. Still, being someone who really hates almost all forms of make-up, I can relate to the sentiments that motivated this specific poster. And yes, I certainly deplore the fact that ALL models shave their armpits and most their pussies. I'd love to see more girls in a more natural state (as in: no make-up, no hair removed). And it's BDSM, right? Forced orgasms, but not forced make-up removal? Occasionnally at least? C'mon ! Oh, and that should be "Now you're telling". Don't let your annoyment cloud your education, please! OK, I realise I'm more than 11 years too late in responding to that particular post <lol> Happens to me a lot, I'm terrible at saying the right stuff at the right time. And chances are that this webmaster is no longer working for kink. Never mind, I just wanted to say this :-)

Hogtied