Public Disgrace - The Best of Europe - Walks of Shame
Whipped Ass - Lesbian BDSM - Nominated for Best BDSM Release AVN Awards Show

Comments made by durkhiem

Date Comment Site
Dec 10, 2010

Nika is fantastic because she often looks like she is into it. She is one of the best; only Sinn compares. No matter how attractive the models, lets face it, the sets and scripts are all painfully formulaic and routine. The models either bring chemistry, passion or acting to the shoot or they don't. If they do, then that is what makes the difference. Without that, these shoots just flash for a moment, bounce around for a few months in cyber-advertising and then fade out entirely and nobody regrets it when they do because another similar uninspired shoot will take its place here or somewhere else. Don't ever take talent for granite.

Whipped Ass
Jul 11, 2008

The worst yet

Whipped Ass
Mar 4, 2008

Perhaps minor points, but the interview portions of these matches seem formulaic in content and are not produced very well. Matt's voice is muffled, soft and garbled except at higher volumes. There is also an echo effect. Moreover, for the most part the girls all say the same things, which leads me to suggest that Matt should take a different approach to questions (we have heard too much on "what did you learn?" what did you think of your opponent?" What do you need to do to improve?). Ask different questions. Why not ask what did you enjoy the most in your win? To losers ask - what part of the winner's body did you see the most? (perhaps that's lame). Also, with some exceptions, the R4 actions are all pretty much the same; you could breath some small sense of authenticity into the presentation by asking the winner what she liked most (what position or technique) in R4. You could encourage each girl to develop a unique twist on a position or technique; or ask if they plan on developing a technique or position that they will make their trademark when they win?

Ultimate Surrender
Jun 16, 2007

great idea and production, but how about a little less 2 on 1 and more two on two where the tops compete to out do each other in round four.

Ultimate Surrender
Sep 30, 2006

Tory is the best dom. The restraints on the sub just keep Tori from positioning the sub for the strap on. Less restraints during strap on please.

Whipped Ass
Sep 19, 2006

A fantastic wrestling match, in which everyone involved afforded themselves well, including the referee. Although a winner was declared, dominance was not demonstrated even by the actions of Round 4, and there is where the problem lies, if there is a problem. Although the design, intent and governing thesis of this website has never been fully explained, I believe it has been generally assumed by all, that Round 4 was intended to amplify in sex the dominance demonstrated in the earlier rounds of wrestling. In short, sexual and psychological dominance in round 4 would provide escalating tension or a "crescendo" for the physical dominance demonstrated in the earlier rounds. Here, that element was missing, as winning did not mean dominance, notwithstanding Syd's best efforts. If anything Syd's dominance was put into question by this match, her frailties and weakness exposed as much by her hesitant speech in her interview as the closeness of the match. In fact, I suspect that is why many were disappointed by the sexual tension of round 4, though not at all with the wrestling. But this match truly demonstrates how much this site, by combinging truly competitive wrestling with sex, takes risks in balancing the allure of sport with the pruience of porn. Here, great wrestling prevailed; dominance themed sex was overshadowed. Nevertheless, the result, showing a different side to Syd, and a unique round 4, was worth the price of admission. Maybe this review is a little overblown, but it is my impression, honestly given.

Ultimate Surrender
Sep 17, 2006

last word should have been "dom." Also the overall rating is a 5 not 3, despite critique.

Whipped Ass
Sep 17, 2006

excellent edition. However, the camera work needs improvement. Part of this site's attraction is that it showcases dominants, who appear to enjoy their work. Almost invariably, however, the camera focuses on the sub during the climax moments of each scene to the exclusion of the dom. The interview's focus on the sub's experiences again betrays the skewed focus of the production team, albeit it is obvious that the interview is conducted in this fashion to ensure that the viewer and any other reviewers know that everything filmed was consensual and legal. But many of us want to know what the dom was thinking or feeling. I guess, it is assumed by the production team that the predominantly male viewership knows what she is thinking or feeling during the shoot, but that suggests that our collective and presumably uniform projections of her psyche will suffice and that nothing erotic could be added by revealing the unique thoughts of the sub

Whipped Ass
Jul 28, 2006

Interesting matchup. You should have more of these matches between inexperienced or marginal wrestlers. It is rare for this site to give the novice the opportunity to experience and develop the pleasure of being in the top position. It is exciting to watch the inexperienced winner developing her own style of winning. It could be my imagination but it sometimes seems that such winners see relish the opportunity to dominate when they have the rare chance. Would like to see the Marauder have her day. Round four was a little short.

Ultimate Surrender
Jul 19, 2006

I think that goes to far. The problem really is not that people know a match has been scheduled, completed, is ready for editing or has been edited on any particular day, be it a week ago or six months ago. The problem is that people who read the schedule will get impatient and then pressure Matt to disclose details about release dates. All is cured if the "company policy" is that you respond by stating the "the match will be released at the appropriate time" taking into consideration the objectives of this site to build drama and suspense into the schedule leading up to a finale between the best two wrestlers based on record in the round.

Ultimate Surrender
Jul 19, 2006

Good work by all. The following comment is meant in response to posting in a forum that I was not able to "register" for because of "customer support problems," so my apology for posting here. Matt said: "It is impossable (sic) to schedule matches based on what happen last week, I don't really expect anyone to understand that." I understand that wrestlers must be scheduled based on things other than by rankings and results on a weekly basis etc, and it is great that Matt attempts to "release" the shoots in an order that builds suspense and the drama of the final showdown. However, in rebuffing the criticisms of those who would like Matt to use the "FIFO" method (first in first out) he spoiled the drama by indicating that the finale for the season will be Ninja v. Syd. Obviously that suggests something about any Ninja v. Vendetta match in the present round. In the future, just say that the match will be released at the appropriate time.

Ultimate Surrender
May 16, 2006

One correction: Because sexual enjoyment is 90% mental, a woman wearing a strap-on could enjoy using it without obtaining complete penetration. My only point is that stimulation is enhanced if the base makes contact through pressure to her clitoris.

Whipped Ass
May 16, 2006

Although it is part of the website's bondage/domination theme, too many of the site's shoots take place in dungeon, wherehouse or other dark settings. As a result, what is intended as a unique and powerful fantasy becomes through endless repetition only ordinary and commonplace. More outdoor and different settings please. Also, although it is clear that the director is trying to create variety by integrating new fetishes (smoking) into the shoot, this and many of the other shoots still come across as mechanical and uninspired. My own humble opinion is that what this website has achieved on occasion but what it fails to do more and more frequently is present the illusion of real topping by a dominate woman who takes sexual pleasure from physical, psychological and sexual dominance over another woman. The early shoots involving (I forget her name from Red Board) had this quality because she always kept her prey off balance it seemed as she moved from one sexual urge to another. Overdirection, bizarre restraints and camera shots focusing in on penetration and toys at the expense of physical contact and control (mounting and domination)only highlight and undermine the essential fantasy that underlies good features of this genre -- that the top is in control and enjoying what SHE wants, or at least what we viewers fantasize that she wants. For that reason, camera angles that focus exclusively on the bottom or cut the top out of strap on action (which I admit this shoot didn't do), or that require that top face the camera while ackwardly strapping all make obvious that the action is orchestrated to please the viewer, not the participants. In addition, if a woman uses a strap on she can only enjoy it if she makes contact with the bottom; lets see complete penetration; use it like a man would a penis. I will not forget that the top is using a strap on if I don't always see it going half in. When you are receiving 75-80% positive feedback, I realize it will be difficult to change the formula, but I figured I'd try anyway. Nothing wrong with your models, always attractive and enthusiastic.

Whipped Ass
Mar 14, 2006

Surprisingly good match. Solid round 4. Liked Seven's facial expressions and in Round 4 when she got almost flat on Lola's back and locked her arms under Lolas arm pits for thrusting leverage. Looked like she enjoyed dominating in round 4. Hope to see Seven against weaker opponents, but it doesn't sound like it is in the cards. And, the strap-on action doesn't get old here because the "dynamics" or "chemistry" between the wrestlers remains fresh. Other than keeping the match-ups new, the key is not to exclude full body shots and facial expressions. So many of the other purveyors of the strap on genre over-emphasize close ups of the strap on, detach the strap on from the woman wearing it, and focus entirely on the face and body of the women getting strapped. Combine this type of poor camera work with girls guiding the strap on at an angle by hand and moving it in half-way, while both turn to the camera and you have strap-on sex that is reduced to a "non-combat sport" where it is clear that the director is in control, not a sexy woman wearing a strap-on who is into what she is doing. Anyway, these failures of vision don't happen here.

Ultimate Surrender
Dec 2, 2005

Fine effort. The flat face down doggie is the best. Good camera work. Only complaint is that positions could be maintained longer in round 4. Would give a "5" but perfection is better to work toward than achieve.

Ultimate Surrender